4.7 Article

An analysis of strategies for adopting blockchain technology in the fresh product supply chain

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
卷 61, 期 11, 页码 3717-3734

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2021.1894497

关键词

Supply chain managemnet; fresh product supply chain; blockchain technology; traceability; pricing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the strategies for adopting blockchain technology in the fresh product supply chain and finds that it is not always the optimal decision. Regardless of the power and status of each member in the supply chain, they can lead the construction of the blockchain system. From the perspective of whole supply chain's profit maximisation, the leader of the supply chain should lead the construction of the blockchain system.
This paper investigates the strategies for adopting blockchain technology in the fresh product supply chain (FPSC) consisting of a supplier, a third-party logistics service provider (3PL) and an e-tailer. We analyse the optimal strategies of FPSC members under the benchmark scenario where the FPSC does not adopt blockchain technology and those under the three scenarios where the supplier, 3PL and e-tailer lead the construction of the blockchain-based traceability system (BTS), respectively. We find that adopting blockchain technology is not always the optimal decision for the FPSC, which is related to the consumers' acceptance degree for the product without blockchain technology, the deterioration rate of the fresh product and the allocation proportion of traceability cost of FPSC members when adopting blockchain technology. Regardless of the power and status of each member in the FPSC, it can lead the construction of the BTS. From the perspective of whole FPSC's profit maximisation, the leader of the FPSC should lead the construction of the BTS under the coordination of a two-part tariff contract. This study provides valuable insights for FPSCs to adopt blockchain technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据