4.7 Article

Comparison of Atmospheric Pressure Ionization for the Analysis of Heavy Petroleum Fractions with Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 30, 期 11, 页码 8896-8903

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01191

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [31708]
  2. Region Haute Normandie (Crunch Network) [20-13]
  3. Labex SynOrg [ANR-11-LABX-0029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Because of its high molecular complexity, ultra high-resolution Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FTICR-MS) is used to characterize heavy petroleum distillates. However, high peak capacity can also be obtained with ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IM-MS). In this case, the additional separation dimension allows for the compensation of the lower resolving power of the time-of-flight mass analyzer. The processing and elemental composition assignments from such bidimensional IM-MS data cannot be achieved with conventional software packages. PetroOrg, a new software package, was used to compare IM-MS data sets recorded with atmospheric solid analysis probe (ASAP) and three other atmospheric pressure ionization sources. The choice of the ionization source is indeed very critical as it defines the type of compounds that can be detected from mixtures. Electrospray ionization (ESI) is very specific to polar compounds and yields relatively simple data sets that can be readily attributed to nitrogen containing compounds allowing their speciation. On the other hand, gas phase ionization methods such as APCI, APPI, and ASAP yielded valuable information concerning thiophenic species. However, in this case the IM-MS peak capacity is not sufficient to separate all isobaric species. It is worth noting that ASAP and APPI yielded similar mass spectra although the ASAP ionization mechanism is believed to be closer to that of APCI. Most likely this is due to the absence of solvent with ASAP that reinforces charge exchange processes and therefore affords low ionization discrimination such as with APPI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据