4.7 Article

Electrosprayed mucoadhesive alginate-chitosan microcapsules for gastrointestinal delivery of probiotics

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120342

关键词

Electrospraying; Microcapsules; Probiotics; Mucoadhesion; Alginate; Chitosan

资金

  1. European Union's Erasmus + programme
  2. Doctoral School of Food Science, Szent Istvan University, Hungary

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focused on the importance of prolonged gastrointestinal retention for probiotics delivery. Different formulations of alginate microparticles were prepared using electrospray technique, with chitosan-coated microparticles showing the highest mucoadhesive property. A novel in vitro wash-off mucoadhesion test setup was successfully validated for evaluating the performance of these probiotic formulations.
Besides viability protection, a sufficiently prolonged gastrointestinal retention of probiotics has emerged as critically important in improving the functional effectiveness of gastrointestinal delivery of these microorganisms. In this work, we formulated pure, resistant starch-reinforced and chitosan-coated alginate microparticles using an electrospray technique and evaluated their performance as mucoadhesive probiotic formulations for gastrointestinal delivery. In addition, we designed and successfully validated a novel experimental set-up of in vitro wash-off mucoadhesion test, using a portable and low-cost USB microscope for fluorescence imaging. In our test, pure chitosan microparticles (positive control) exhibited the greatest mucoadhesive property, whereas the alginate-resistant starch ones (negative control) were the least retentive on a gastric mucosa. These electrosprayed formulations were spherically shaped, with a size range of 30-600 mu m (60-1300 mu m with chitosan coating). Moreover, model probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum loaded in alginate-starch formulations was better protected against simulated gastric conditions than in alginate ones, but not better than in the chitosan-coated ones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据