4.7 Review

Application of Radiosensitizers in Cancer Radiotherapy

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NANOMEDICINE
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 1083-1102

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S290438

关键词

radiosensitizers; cancer radiotherapy; therapeutics; nanomedicine; mechanism

资金

  1. Innovation Capacity Support Plan of Shaanxi Province [2018TD-002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82000523]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi province [2020JQ087, 2020JQ-095]
  4. Young Talent Support Plan of Xi'an Jiaotong University [YX6J001]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [xzy012019070]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radiosensitizers are agents that can enhance the killing effect on tumor cells by accelerating DNA damage and producing free radicals. In recent years, strategies have been developed to create highly effective and low toxicity radiosensitizers.
Radiotherapy (RT) is a cancer treatment that uses high doses of radiation to kill cancer cells and shrink tumors. Although great success has been achieved on radiotherapy, there is still an intractable challenge to enhance radiation damage to tumor tissue and reduce side effects to healthy tissue. Radiosensitizers are chemicals or pharmaceutical agents that can enhance the killing effect on tumor cells by accelerating DNA damage and producing free radicals indirectly. In most cases, radiosensitizers have less effect on normal tissues. In recent years, several strategies have been exploited to develop radiosensitizers that are highly effective and have low toxicity. In this review, we first summarized the applications of radiosensitizers including small molecules, macromolecules, and nanomaterials, especially those that have been used in clinical trials. Second, the development states of radiosensitizers and the possible mechanisms to improve radiosensitizers sensibility are reviewed. Third, the challenges and prospects for clinical translation of radiosensitizers in oncotherapy are presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据