4.7 Article

High Throughput Proteomic Exploration of Hypothermic Preservation Reveals Active Processes within the Cell Associated with Cold Ischemia Kinetic

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22052384

关键词

ischemia-reperfusion; organ preservation; cellular mechanism; proteomics; metabolism

资金

  1. Region Poitou Charentes
  2. University of Poitiers
  3. Inserm
  4. CHU de Poitiers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study indicates that significant changes in protein expression occur in key pathways during organ preservation, with time-sensitive protein expression potentially serving as quality biomarkers for organs and targets for new strategies.
The demand for organs to be transplanted increases pressure on procurement centers, to the detriment of organ quality, increasing complications. New preservation protocols are urgently needed, requiring an in-depth understanding of ischemia-reperfusion mechanisms. We performed a proteomic analysis using LC-MS/MS-TOF data analyzed through R software and Cytoscape's ClueGO application, comparing the proteome of kidney endothelial cells, key cell type, subjected to 3, 6, 12, 19, and 24 h of cold ischemia and 6 h reperfusion. Critical pathways such as energy metabolism, cytoskeleton structure/transport system, and gene transcription/translation were modulated. Important time windows were revealed: a-during the first 3 h, central proteins were upregulated within these pathways; b-the majority of these upregulations were maintained until 12 h cold ischemia time (CIT); c-after that time, the overall decrease in protein expression was observed; d-at reperfusion, proteins expressed in response to cold ischemia were all downregulated. This shows that cold ischemia is not a simple slowing down of metabolism, as deep changes take place within the proteome on major pathways. Time-sensitive expression of key protein reveals possible quality biomarkers as well as potential targets for new strategies to maintain or optimize organ quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据