4.7 Review

Regenerative Stem Cell Therapy for Neurodegenerative Diseases: An Overview

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22042153

关键词

stem cells; therapy; regenerative; neurodegenerative diseases; Parkinson’ s disease; Huntington’ s disease; Alzheimer’ s disease; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Drug Abuse [R01DA029121, R01DA049737]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01NS117906]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurodegenerative diseases lead to paralysis, cognitive decline, and sensory loss. Stem cell therapy shows promise in treating these disorders by repairing damaged neural tissue and protecting healthy cells. Progress in stem cell technologies may lead to realistic and efficacious treatments for neurodegenerative disorders.
Neurodegenerative diseases resulting from the progressive loss of structure and/or function of neurons contribute to different paralysis degrees and loss of cognition and sensation. The lack of successful curative therapies for neurodegenerative disorders leads to a considerable burden on society and a high economic impact. Over the past 20 years, regenerative cell therapy, also known as stem cell therapy, has provided an excellent opportunity to investigate potentially powerful innovative strategies for treating neurodegenerative diseases. This is due to stem cells' capability to repair injured neuronal tissue by replacing the damaged or lost cells with differentiated cells, providing a conducive environment that is in favor of regeneration, or protecting the existing healthy neurons and glial cells from further damage. Thus, in this review, the various types of stem cells, the current knowledge of stem-cell-based therapies in neurodegenerative diseases, and the recent advances in this field are summarized. Indeed, a better understanding and further studies of stem cell technologies cause progress into realistic and efficacious treatments of neurodegenerative disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据