4.7 Article

Validation of a Three-Dimensional Head and Neck Spheroid Model to Evaluate Cameras for NIR Fluorescence-Guided Cancer Surgery

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22041966

关键词

indocyanine green; multicellular tumor spheroids; head and neck cancer; fluorescence-guided surgery

资金

  1. Canceropole Grand Est
  2. Institut de Cancerologie de Lorraine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a head and neck multicellular tumor spheroid model to evaluate cameras for NIR fluorescence-guided surgery protocols. The experiment showed that the fluorescence signal was significantly different at different depths for FaDu spheroids exposed to ICG in tissue-like phantoms, with a positive correlation between fluorescence intensity and spheroid size, and a negative correlation with depth.
Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence-guided surgery is an innovative technique for the real-time visualization of resection margins. The aim of this study was to develop a head and neck multicellular tumor spheroid model and to explore the possibilities offered by it for the evaluation of cameras for NIR fluorescence-guided surgery protocols. FaDu spheroids were incubated with indocyanine green (ICG) and then included in a tissue-like phantom. To assess the capability of Fluobeam (R) NIR camera to detect ICG in tissues, FaDu spheroids exposed to ICG were embedded in 2, 5 or 8 mm of tissue-like phantom. The fluorescence signal was significantly higher between 2, 5 and 8 mm of depth for spheroids treated with more than 5 mu g/mL ICG (p < 0.05). The fluorescence intensity positively correlated with the size of spheroids (p < 0.01), while the correlation with depth in the tissue-like phantom was strongly negative (p < 0.001). This multicellular spheroid model embedded in a tissue-like phantom seems to be a simple and reproducible in vitro tumor model, allowing a comparison of NIR cameras. The ideal configuration seems to be 450 mu m FaDu spheroids incubated for 24 h with 0.05 mg/mL of ICG, ensuring the best stability, toxicity, incorporation and signal intensity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据