4.7 Review

Role of Exosomal miRNA in Bladder Cancer: A Promising Liquid Biopsy Biomarker

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22041713

关键词

bladder cancer; liquid biopsy; exosome; exosomal miRNAs

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) by the Ministry of Education [2020R1I1A3062508]
  2. Osong Medical Innovation foundation by Chungcheongbuk-do [AG200904005, AG200902001]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1I1A3062508] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bladder cancer is the most common neoplasm of the urinary tract, and liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising field of cancer research. Liquid biopsy samples offer comprehensive information and enable tracking of genetic evolution of the disease.
Bladder cancer (BCa) is the most prevalent neoplasia of the urinary tract. Unfortunately, limited improvements in effective BCa management have meant that it remains a challenging disease. Cystoscopy has been the gold standard for BCa diagnosis and surveillance for over two centuries but is an invasive and expensive approach. Recently, liquid biopsy has been identified as a promising field of cancer research, due to its noninvasiveness and ease of sampling. Liquid biopsy samples could provide comprehensive information regarding the genetic landscape of cancer and could track genomic evolution of the disease over time. Exosomes, which contain RNAs, DNAs, and proteins, are a potential source of tumor biomarkers in liquid biopsy samples. In particular, exosomal miRNAs (exomiRs) hold great promise as biomarkers for tumor development and progression. In this review, we provide an overview of liquid biopsy biomarkers, with a particular focus on the use of exomiRs as biomarkers of cancer, and summarize their clinical implications for BCa. Finally, we discuss the future perspectives of these biomarkers in cancer research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据