4.7 Review

Dental Pulp-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Modeling Genetic Disorders

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22052269

关键词

dental pulp stem cells; disease model; mesenchymal stem cells; stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [KAKENHI] [JP19K10387, JP19K10406, JP19K19272, JP19K10386]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dental pulp stem cells, derived from multipotent neural crest cells, have high proliferative capacity and multipotent potential for various applications. Stem cells donated by patients with genetic disorders can serve as disease models. Ethical considerations and potential applications of these stem cells donated and reused are worth exploring.
A subpopulation of mesenchymal stem cells, developmentally derived from multipotent neural crest cells that form multiple facial tissues, resides within the dental pulp of human teeth. These stem cells show high proliferative capacity in vitro and are multipotent, including adipogenic, myogenic, osteogenic, chondrogenic, and neurogenic potential. Teeth containing viable cells are harvested via minimally invasive procedures, based on various clinical diagnoses, but then usually discarded as medical waste, indicating the relatively low ethical considerations to reuse these cells for medical applications. Previous studies have demonstrated that stem cells derived from healthy subjects are an excellent source for cell-based medicine, tissue regeneration, and bioengineering. Furthermore, stem cells donated by patients affected by genetic disorders can serve as in vitro models of disease-specific genetic variants, indicating additional applications of these stem cells with high plasticity. This review discusses the benefits, limitations, and perspectives of patient-derived dental pulp stem cells as alternatives that may complement other excellent, yet incomplete stem cell models, such as induced pluripotent stem cells, together with our recent data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据