4.6 Article

Liquid-liquid extraction of phosphorus from sulfuric acid solution using benzyl dimethyl amine

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12613-020-2151-8

关键词

solvent extraction; phosphorus; benzyl dimethyl amine (BDMA); sulfuric acid solution; McCabe-Thiele diagram

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the liquid-liquid extraction behavior of phosphorus from a sulfuric acid solution using BDMA in kerosene, demonstrating the formation of a 3[BDMA].[H3PO4] over bar complex in the organic phase. Thermodynamic properties show that the extraction process is exothermic, and the McCabe-Thiele diagram confirms the need for three counter-current stages in the extraction at a specific O/A volume ratio. Additionally, quantitative back-extraction of phosphorus from the loaded organic phase is achieved by contacting H2SO4 solution in three stages of counter-current contact at a specific O/A volume ratio.
This study addresses the liquid-liquid extraction behavior of phosphorus from a sulfuric acid solution using benzyl dimethyl amine (BDMA) in kerosene. The extraction equilibria investigated with varied BDMA concentrations could reveal the formation of 3[BDMA].[H3PO4] over bar complex in the organic phase. The thermodynamic properties determined at various temperatures indicated that the process was exothermic with a calculated enthalpy (Delta H-circle minus) of -24.0 kJ.mol(-1). The organic-to-aqueous phase (O/A) volume ratio was varied to elucidate the quantitative extraction of phosphorus. The McCabe-Thiele diagram plotted for the extraction isotherm was validated for the requirement of three counter-current stages in the extraction at an O/A volume ratio of 2.0/3.5. The back-extraction of phosphorus from the loaded organic phase was quantitatively achieved by contacting 4.0 mol.L-1 H2SO4 solution in three stages of counter-current contact at an O/A volume ratio of 3/2. This study can be applied to remove phosphorus from the sulfuric acid leach solutions of monazite processing, and many other solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据