4.7 Article

An innovative quasi-zero stiffness isolator with three pairs of oblique springs

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106093

关键词

Oblique spring; Quasi-zero stiffness; Experiment; Vibration isolation

资金

  1. Program of Henan Municipal Education Commission [19A130003]
  2. Coal Services Health & Safety Trust (CSHST) [20651]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces an innovative design of quasi-zero stiffness isolator with three pairs of oblique springs, optimizing for lower transmissibility and wider QZS region. The design is validated through static and dynamic analyses, showing improved performance compared to traditional isolators.
This paper presents an innovative design of the quasi-zero stiffness (QZS) isolator with three pairs of oblique springs. Formulations of stiffness are firstly derived and parameter study is then conducted to obtain an optimal design of the proposed isolator. The proposed isolator initially has five independent parameters. By imposing stiffness and its second order derivative to be zero at the static equilibrium position, there exist three independent parameters that can be optimised to design this type of QZS isolator. A distinctive feature of the proposed isolator is that there exists a nearly horizontal straight line near the equilibrium position in the stiffness curve as the nonlinear coefficient of the Taylor expansion up to the third order of the elastic force or the Duffing differential equation is very small; thus a wider QZS region with lower transmissibility can be achieved in the present isolator. Static and dynamic analyses are presented with focusing on dynamic response in terms of displacement transmissibility. A prototype is fabricated and tested to evaluate the proposed design. The experimental results validate the present formulations in static and dynamic analyses and show lower transmissibility as compared to the corresponding QZS isolator with one pair of oblique springs and the linear isolator.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据