4.7 Article

Assessment of commercial SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays, Jamaica

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 105, 期 -, 页码 333-336

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.059

关键词

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Antibody; Serology; Caribbean; Jamaica

资金

  1. University at Buffalo Clinical and Translational Science Institute [UL1TR001412]
  2. Global Infectious Diseases Research Training Program [D43TW010919]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of various SARS-CoV-2 tests in Jamaica showed comparable diagnostic sensitivities and specificities, with better results for moderate to critical cases. However, these tests have limited utility for asymptomatic and mild infections.
Background: The performance of the Roche Elecsys (R) Anti-SARS-CoV-2, Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgM, Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG, Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgA, Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA, and Trillium IgG/IgM rapid assays was evaluated in Jamaica. Methods: Diagnostic sensitivities of the assays were assessed by testing serum samples from SARS-CoV-2 PCR-confirmed persons and diagnostic specificity was assessed by testing serum samples collected during 2018-2019 from healthy persons and from persons with antibodies to a wide range of viral infections. Results: Serum samples collected >14 days after onset of symptoms, or an initial SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive test for asymptomatics, showed diagnostic sensitivities ranging from 67.9 to 75.0% when including all possible disease severities and increased to 90.0-95.0% when examining those with moderate to critical disease. Grouping moderate to critical disease showed a significant association with a SARS-CoV-2 antibody positive result for all assays. Diagnostic specificity ranged from 96.7 to 100.0%. For all assays examined, SARS-CoV-2 real-time PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values of the initial nasopharyngeal swab sample testing positive were significantly different for samples testing antibody positive versus negative. Conclusions: These data from a predominantly African descent Caribbean population show comparable diagnostic sensitivities and specificities for all testing platforms assessed and limited utility of these tests for persons with asymptomatic and mild infections. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据