4.7 Article

Intelligent networks for crosswise stream nanofluidic model with Cu-H2O over porous stretching medium

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 29, 页码 15322-15336

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.02.108

关键词

Neural networks; Leverberg-marquardt; backpropagation; Crosswise stream flow; Nanofluid; Stretching sheet

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on investigating the heat transfer phenomena in nanofluidic system with Cu - H2O over stretched porous media using a stochastic solver and Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation networks. Mathematical models are described in PDEs and reduced to ODEs for analysis.
The porous media transport theories are thoroughly operative to analyse transferral phenomenon in reducing the bio-convective flow instabilities and biological tissues. The present study is designed to investigate the heat transfer phenomena in nanofluidic system involving Cu - H2O over the stretched porous media with the strength of stochastic solver via Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation networks. The mathematical model of physical phenomena is described in PDEs that are reduced to system of ODEs through scaling group transformations. The datasets are determined through explicit Runge-Kutta numerical method and used as a target parameter for the development of continuous neural networks mapping. The training, testing and validation processes are utilized in learning of neural network models based on backpropagation of Levenberg-Marquardt technique to determines the solution of different scenarios constructed on the various values of porosity parameter along with six different cases based on the stretching ratio values. Validation and verification of neural network model to find the solution of nanfluidic problem is endorsed on the assessment of achieved accuracy through mean squared error, error histograms and regression studies. ? 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据