4.7 Review

A review of metallic tanks for H2 storage with a view to application in future green shipping

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 9, 页码 6151-6179

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.168

关键词

Hydrogen fuel for ships; Cryogenic hydrogen storage; Failure mechanisms; Material selection; Mechanical properties

资金

  1. UKRI HEIF Research Collaboration Stimulus Fund
  2. University of Southampton

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing environmental legislation requires the marine industry to reduce greenhouse gases, sulphur oxides, and nitrogen oxides emissions. Insights from academic and industrial activities show tangible opportunities for adopting alternative fuels, with hydrogen as a promising option. However, large-scale bunkering of hydrogen on marine platforms poses inherent risks.
Increasing environmental legislation necessitates action within the marine industry to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases, sulphur oxides and nitrogen oxides. Several short-term/intermediate solutions have been introduced. However, the ultimate goal is to achieve complete green shipping. Insights gained from academic and industrial activities demonstrate tangible opportunities for adopting alternative fuels and/or energy sources for future ships, amongst which hydrogen is a promising option. Large scale bunkering of hydrogen on-board marine platforms is inherently risky. To determine the best practice and limitations of current techniques, this review summarises the state-of-the-art in storing hydrogen (fuel) for ships. This review focuses on the mechanical testing, selection of materials and failure mechanisms for cryo-compressed and liquid hydrogen tanks and their insulations. The review also discusses the regulatory aspects with a particular focus on the routes to approval. Knowledge gaps are identified to facilitate further research and development in this field. (c) 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据