4.7 Article

CuO/CuBi2O4 bilayered heterojunction as an efficient photocathode for photoelectrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 21, 页码 11607-11620

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.050

关键词

Copper oxide; Copper bismuthate; Bilayered heterojunction; Photoelectrochemical water splitting; Hydrogen evolution reaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 51672017, 51872015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The construction of a novel CuO/CuBi2O4 bilayered structure and decoration with NiOx electrocatalysts effectively improved the photoactivity and photostability for PEC HER, setting a new efficiency benchmark and providing principles for designing layered heterojunctions for PEC water splitting.
The poor photostability and low photoactivity are two bottlenecks limiting the application of CuO and CuBi2O4 as competitive candidates for photoelectrochemical (PEC) hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). To overcome the bottlenecks, we constructed a novel CuO/CuBi2O4 bilayered structure for PEC HER. The underlying CuO layer functions as the main photoabsorber, while the outside CuBi2O4 layer acts as a protection shield. After further decorated with the NiOx electrocatalysts, the CuO/CuBi2O4/NiOx photocathode exhibits a high photoactivity and remarkable photostability. We ascribe this excellent performance to the following factors: (1) the bilayer structure improves light harvesting efficiency, (2) the outside CuBi2O4 enhances the photostability, (3) the favorable band alignment increases charge separation efficiency, and (4) the presence of NiOx facilitates the charges transfer at the interface. Therefore, this work not only sets a new benchmark efficiency for the CuO and CuBi2O4 heterojunction, but also provides principles for designing layered heterojunction for PEC water splitting. (C) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据