4.7 Article

Structural effect of ZrO2 on supported Ni-based catalysts for supercritical water gasification of oil-containing wastewater

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 24, 页码 12874-12885

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.082

关键词

Ni/ZrO2 catalyst; Supercritical water gasification; Crystal structure; Calcination temperature; Stability

资金

  1. Basic Science Center Program for Ordered Energy Conversion of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51888103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A Ni/ZrO2 catalyst with mixed phase of tetragonal ZrO2 and monoclinic ZrO2 shows high catalytic activity and stability in supercritical water gasification of oil mixture. Optimal gasification conditions for oil-containing wastewater treatment are obtained, providing guidance for different concentrations of oil-containing wastewater.
Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) is a promising technology to treat oil-containing wastewater. This study reports a Ni/ZrO2 catalyst with mixed phase of tetragonal ZrO2 and monoclinic ZrO2 synthesized by a one-step sol-gel method, which shows good catalytic activity and stability in SCWG of oil mixture. The evolution of particle size, crystal structure, and pore size caused by increasing calcination temperature is demonstrated by X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. When calcined at 700 degrees C, Ni/ZrO2 shows superior catalytic activity and stability in SCWG reaction, with a high carbon gasification efficiency of 91.3% at 500 degrees C. The characterizations of fresh and spent catalysts suggest that Ni/ZrO2 catalyst with the fraction of monoclinic ZrO2 around 75% would be highly active and stable in SCWG reaction. In addition, two sets of optimal gasification conditions of SCWG of oil are obtained by varying operating parameters, which provides guidance for different concentrations of oil-containing wastewater treatment. (C) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据