4.6 Article

Performance of an amine-based CO2 capture pilot plant at the Fortum Oslo Varme Waste to Energy plant in Oslo, Norway

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103242

关键词

CO2 capture; Post combustion; Emissions; Solvent degradation; Amines; Waste incineration; PTR-TOF-MS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the results and data of Fortum Oslo Varme AS's pilot plant construction in their waste to energy plant in Klemetsrud, Oslo, Norway. The pilot plant campaign successfully demonstrated low amine emissions and provided important data on absorbent degradation and other performance parameters.
Fortum Oslo Varme AS (FOV) decided (in July 2018) to build a 1:350 scale pilot plant to demonstrate that the selected Shell's CANSOLV capture technology using solvent DC-103 is suitable for cleaning CO2 from the exhaust gases of their waste to energy (WtE) plant at Klemetsrud in Oslo, Norway. This paper presents the most important measurement data and results from a pilot plant testing campaign from March to December 2019. The project stated requirements for the successful completion of the first pilot plant campaign were at least 2000 operational hours and total amine emissions lower than 0.4 ppmv on average over the last 500 h of testing. Emphasis is on the online emission measurement results both with and without an aerosol emissions mitigation system located downstream of the capture unit. The impact of perturbations in the plant operating conditions and inlet gas quality is discussed, in particular the particulates content. The pilot plant campaign achieved its primary purpose of demonstrating low amine emissions. It also produced important data on absorbent degradation in actual operation on WtE flue gas while confirming other performance parameters such as CO2 capture efficiency, steam consumption and CO2 product purity. Thus, it can be concluded that the all requirements according to objectives of the pilot campaign were successfully met.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据