4.7 Article

Tensile and fatigue properties of Super304H welded joint at elevated temperatures

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105989

关键词

Super304H welded joint; Tensile properties; Fatigue properties; Fatigue life prediction; Elevated temperature

资金

  1. National Research Council of Science and Technology (NST) grant by the Korea government (MSIT) [CRC-15-07-KIER]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the tensile and fatigue properties of Super304H welded joint at elevated temperatures up to 750 degrees C, focusing on the operating temperature range of 500-700 degrees C. It was found that the tensile strength of the welded joint was similar to that of the base metal, but a significant reduction in elongation and fatigue resistance at low strain amplitudes was observed in the welded joint.
Super304H is a promising candidate for heat exchangers in boiler systems used in thermal power plants operating at ultra-supercritical conditions, and the mechanical properties of its welded joint play a decisive role in the reliability of the thermal power plant. Herein, we report the tensile and fatigue properties of Super304H welded joint at elevated temperatures up to 750 degrees C, focusing on the operating temperature range of 500-700 degrees C. Our results showed that the tensile strength of the welded joint was almost the same as that of the base metal at all test temperatures, meeting the requirement for weld integrity, but a significant reduction in the elongation was induced in the welded joint due to non-uniform deformation that promotes deformation localization, leading to an early occurrence of necking. As for fatigue resistance, both the welded joint and base metal had comparable fatigue lives at high strain amplitudes (>=-0.4%) in the temperature range of 500-700 degrees C, whereas a drastic reduction in the fatigue resistance was observed in the welded joint at low strain amplitudes (

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据