4.5 Article

Air pollution and airborne infection with mycobacterial bioaerosols: a potential attribution of soot

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-021-03203-7

关键词

Airborne pathogen; Combustion-related pollutants; Non-tuberculosis mycobacterium; Ultraviolet stress

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP15K00568]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study indicates that soot can enhance the survival rate of Mycobacterium smegmatis in the air under UV conditions, suggesting a possible relationship between air pollution and pathogenic viability.
Atmospheric pollutants are hypothesized to enhance the viability of airborne microbes by preventing them from degradation processes, thereby enhancing their atmospheric survival. In this study, Mycobacterium smegmatis is used as a model airborne bacteria, and different amounts of soot particles are employed as model air pollutants. The toxic effects of soot on aerosolized M. smegmatis are first evaluated and excluded by introducing them separately into a chamber, being sampled on a filter, and then cultured and counted. Secondly, the bacteria-soot mixture is exposed to UV with different durations and then cultured for bacterial viability evaluations. The results show that under UV exposure, the survival rates of the low-, medium-, and high-soot groups are 1.1 (+/- 0.8) %, 70.9 (+/- 4.3) %, and 61.0 (+/- 17.6) %, respectively. This evidence significantly enhanced survival rates by soot at all UV exposures, though the combinations of UV exposure and soot amounts revealed a changing pattern of survival rates. The possible influence by direct and indirect effects of UV-damaging mechanisms is proposed. This study indicates the soot-induced survival rate enhancements of M. smegmatis under UV stress conditions, representing the possible relations between air pollution and the extended pathogenic viability and, therefore, increased airborne infection probability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据