4.7 Article

Performance of Cu-Ce/M-Al (M = Mg, Ni, Co, Zn) hydrotalcite derived catalysts for hydrogen production from methanol steam reforming

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 9, 页码 12773-12783

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.6610

关键词

carbon monoxide; hydrogen; hydrotalcite; methanol steam reforming

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21673270]
  2. Natural Science Fund in Liaoning Province [2019-MS-221]
  3. Liaoning Education Department [L2019038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Different divalent metals were used to prepare Cu-Ce/M-Al catalysts for hydrogen production from methanol steam reforming, with Ce-Cu/Zn-Al catalyst showing the best performance. The dispersion, reduction temperature, and oxygen vacancies on the surface played key roles in determining the catalytic performance of the catalysts. At optimal conditions, the methanol conversion reached 100% and the H-2 production rate was 779.7 STP cm(3) kg(-1) s(-1).
M-Al (M = Mg, Ni, Co, Zn) hydrotalcite was synthesized on the surface of the gamma-Al2O3 carrier, and hydrotalcite was calcined to corresponding carrier. Then, A series of Cu-Ce/M-Al catalysts were prepared by the sequential dip method. The catalysts were characterized by the means of XRD, BET, H-2-TPR, and XPS, which investigated the effects of different divalent metals M on the structure, properties, and catalytic performance of hydrotalcite derived catalysts for hydrogen production from methanol steam reforming. The main reasons for different effects on the performance of catalysts lie in the difference of the dispersion, reduction temperature, and the content of oxygen vacancies on the surface. Among them, Ce-Cu/Zn-Al catalyst had the best performance. When the reaction temperature was 250 degrees C, the molar ratio of water to methanol was 1.2, and the space velocity of methanol gas was 800 hours(-1), the methanol conversion reached 100%, and the H-2 production rate was 779.7 STP cm(3) kg(-1) s(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据