4.7 Article

Isolation of an acidic polysaccharide from the flowers of Leucosceptrum canum Smith and its immunomodulatory activity evaluation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.009

关键词

Leucosceptrum canum Smith; Acidic polysaccharide; Purification; Structure; Immunomodulatory activity

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology of Guizhou Province [[2019]1013]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21672206]
  3. General Research Fund [12100615, 22100014]
  4. Health and Medical Research Fund [11122531, 14150521]
  5. Hong Kong Baptist University (RC-start up grant) [MPCF-002-2016/2017, FRG2/16-17/002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A water-soluble acidic polysaccharide (LCP-05) was isolated from Leucosceptrum canum Smith with a molecular weight of approximately 8.9 kDa. LCP-05 is composed of Man, Rha, GlcA, GalA, Glc, Gal and Ara. It has been found to significantly induce the production of NO, IL-6, and TNF-alpha in RAW264.7 cells, as well as have a suppressive effect on cell growth and migration of mammary breast cancer cells.
A water-soluble polysaccharide (LCP-05) was isolated from the flowers of Leucosceptrum canum Smith. LCP-05 was an acidic polysaccharide with a molecular weight of approximately 8.9 kDa. Monosaccharide composition analysis indicated that LCP-05 was composed of Man, Rha, GlcA, GalA, Glc, Gal and Ara in a molar ratio of 0.83:1.68:0.33:2.15:1.00:1.45:1.22. The framework of LCP-05 was speculated to be a branched rhamnogalacturonan with the backbone consisting of alpha-1,2,4-linked Rhap and alpha-1,4-linked GalAp, and bearing branches at the O-4 position of the Rha residues. The side chains are terminated primarily with the Araf and Glcp residues. LCP-05 was found to be able to significantly induce the production of NO, IL-6, and TNF-alpha in RAW264.7 cells, and to induce RAW264.7 cell's suppressive effect on both cell growth and cell migration of 4T1 mammary breast cancer cells. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据