4.5 Article

Graphene modified high-temperature resistant adhesive for bonding carbon/carbon composites: Microstructure characterization and properties study

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.102855

关键词

Carbon-carbon composites; Graphene modified; High temperature resistant adhesive; Finite element analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21071011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel graphene-modified high-temperature resistant adhesive was developed for bonding carbon/carbon composites, showing improved mechanical properties and thermal conductivities. The optimal performance was achieved with 1.5 wt% graphene content, which led to enhanced bonding strength and thermal conductivity compared to other content percentages. The adhesive properties also significantly influenced the braking performance due to thermal conductivity effects on friction surface temperature and distribution.
A novel graphene modified high-temperature resistant adhesive for bonding carbon/carbon composites was developed. The effects of graphene content on the mechanical properties, thermal conductivities and braking properties of the carbon/carbon joints were studied. When the graphene content in the adhesive was 1.5 wt%, the specimens possessed the bonding strength of 13.2 MPa and the thermal conductivity of 23.89 W/(m?k), which were 63.09% and 145.03% higher than those of 0.0 wt%, respectively, and 24.38% and 64.53% higher than those of 5.0 wt%, respectively. The excellent properties were attributed to the uniform dispersion of graphene in the adhesive matrix, which could effectively reduce the stress concentration and provide a fast heat conductivity network chain. The adhesive properties also had an obvious influence on the braking performance. Finite element analysis considered that the main reason for the difference in braking performance was that the temperature and field distribution on the friction surface were affected by the thermal conductivity of the adhesive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据