4.7 Review

XBP1s repression regulates Kupffer cell polarization leading to immune suppressive effects protecting liver allograft in rats

期刊

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107294

关键词

XBP1s; JAK1-STAT1; Kupffer cells; M1/M2; T cells; Liver transplantation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81700573, 81670599, 81671580, 81300364]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals the regulatory role of XBP1 in kupffer cells, affecting the immune response after liver transplantation through different signaling pathways that modulate KC polarization, showing either immunosuppressive or pro-inflammatory effects.
Background: Polarized kupffer cells (KCs) influence the immune response after liver transplantation. We report an undiscovered immune regulatory role of X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1) on immune function of kupffer cells (KCs). Methods: Acute rejection model using rats. Results: We found that suppression of XBP1s in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated KCs could increase the expression of arginase-1 (Arg-1) and CD204 but also decrease the expression levels of MHC-II and CD40 and shift the phenotype markers of KCs toward M2 via the janus kinase (JAK) 3Signal Transducer And Activator Of Transcription (STAT) 6 pathway, presenting an immunosuppressive function by enhancing anti-inflammatory cytokine secretion and accelerating apoptosis of activated T cells. XBP1s over-expression in KCs shift the phenotype markers on KCs towards M1 via the JAK1-STAT1 pathway and have shown a strong pro-inflammatory property. Down-regulation of XBP1s in KCs changed the phenotype and cytokine secretion profile towards M2 and markedly protected the function and structure of allograft liver, prolonging the recipient's survival compared with control and normal saline groups in rats. Conclusions: Our findings reveal a novel regulatory mechanism of XBP1 in an induced immuno-suppressive state to protect rat's liver allograft via JAK-STAT mediated KCs polarization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据