4.7 Article

Effects of supercritical CO2 treatment time, pressure, and temperature on microstructure of shale

期刊

ENERGY
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 173-181

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.124

关键词

SC-CO2; Shale; Specific surface area; Porosity; Microstructure

资金

  1. National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) [2014CB239204]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation Project [51574049]
  3. Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China [IRT13043]
  4. Major Natural Science Program for Central Universities [CDJZR12248801]
  5. Chongqing Frontiers and Application Foundation Research Program [cstc2013jcyjys90001, cstc2015jcyjys90006, cstc2014jcyjA1189]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supercritical CO2 (SC-CO2) fluid is capable of extracting organic matter in shale and dissolving the primary pores and fractures. To determine how well SC-CO2 can influence the microstructure at different traditions, shale samples were treated at different times, pressures and temperatures with SC-CO2. The results showed that crystal water was released from clay mineral in the shale after treatment. The specific surface area and porosity of the shale increased with time and pressure; pressure was significant at transforming shale's microstructure. Under low pressure, SC-CO2 treatment of shale at different temperatures does not have a clear influence on the microstructure of the shale. The porosity had a linear relationship with the specific surface area. The mechanism of changing the microstructure of the shale by SC-CO2 is as follows: as treatment time, pressure and temperature increase, the SC-CO2 fluid increases its density and dissolving capability and can extract more organic matter from the pores and fractures in shale. Concurrently, it increases the number of shale gas seepage channels and widens them. This research lays a foundation for efficient shale gas exploitation with SC-CO2 fluid. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据