4.7 Article

Effect of ultrasonic irradiation on γ-Fe2O3 formation by co-precipitation method with Fe3+ salt and alkaline solution

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.inoche.2020.108400

关键词

gamma-Fe2O3; Ultrasonic irradiation; Impeller stirring; gamma-FeOOH; Co-precipitation method

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrasonic irradiation was found to facilitate the formation of γ-Fe2O3 and hematite through the co-precipitation of Fe3+ salt and excess KOH solution, while impeller stirring only resulted in α-FeOOH and α-Fe2O3. The difference in products between the two methods was attributed to the Lamer model associated with the nucleation and growth of FeOOH.
The effect of ultrasonic irradiation on direct maghemite (gamma-Fe2O3) preparation by a co-precipitation method with Fe3+ salt (Fe(NO3)(3)) and an excess amount of alkaline (KOH) solution without going through the conventional magnetite (Fe3O4) formation route was explored in comparison with impeller stirring. The preparation procedure for obtaining iron oxide nanoparticles was designed using the sequential processes of precipitation, decantation, drying and thermal dehydration, and ultrasonic irradiation or impeller stirring was done during the precipitation process. gamma-ferric oxyhydroxide (gamma-FeOOH) was partially formed in addition to alpha-ferric oxyhydroxide (alpha-FeOOH) and thermally dehydrated to gamma-Fe2O3 and hematite (alpha-Fe2O3) by ultrasonic-assisted co-precipitation of Fe3+ salt and the excess KOH solution, whereas only alpha-FeOOH and alpha-Fe2O3 were synthesized by impeller stirring. The difference between the products of the two methods was explained by the Lamer model associated with the nucleation and growth of FeOOH. Magnetization increased as the crystallite diameter decreased, which is estimated to facilitate partial formation of magnetic gamma-Fe2O3. Magnetization was enhanced by a lower ultrasonic frequency due to the stronger shock wave induced by the cavitation effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据