4.7 Article

Tl2Ir2O7: A Pauli Paramagnetic Metal, Proximal to a Metal Insulator Transition

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 60, 期 7, 页码 4424-4433

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c03124

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR1733071]
  2. Center for Computational Design of Functional Strongly Correlated Materials and Theoretical Spectroscopy under U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FOA-0001276]
  3. DOE, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  4. DOE BES [DE-SC0012704]
  5. MOST [2018YFA03057001, 2017YFB0405703]
  6. NSF of China [11974407]
  7. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS [2020007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tl2Ir2O7 is a Pauli paramagnetic metal that is close to a metal-insulator transition, with unique properties attributed to the electronic configuration difference between Tl3+ and rare-earth ions.
A polycrystalline sample of Tl2Ir2O7 was synthesized by high-pressure and high-temperature methods. Tl2Ir2O7 crystallizes in the cubic pyrochlore structure with space group Fd (3) over barm (No. 227). The Ir4+ oxidation state is confirmed by Ir-L-3 X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy. Combined temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility, resistivity, specific heat, and DFT+DMFT calculation data show that Tl2Ir2O7 is a Pauli paramagnetic metal, but it is close to a metal-insulator transition. The effective ionic size of Tl3+ is much smaller than that of Pr3+ in metallic Pr2Ir2O7; hence, Tl2Ir2O7 would be expected to be insulating according to the established phase diagram of the pyrochlore iridate compounds, A(2)(3+)Ir(2)(4+)O(7). Our experimental and theoretical studies indicate that Tl2Ir2O7 is uniquely different from the current A(2)(3+)Ir(2)(4+)O(7) phase diagram. This uniqueness is attributed primarily to the electronic configuration difference between Tl3+ and rare-earth ions, which plays a substantial role in determining the Ir-O-Ir bond angle, and the corresponding electrical and magnetic properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据