4.7 Article

Resilient observer-based control for cyber-physical systems under denial-of-service attacks

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 545, 期 -, 页码 102-117

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.07.070

关键词

Cyber-physical-system; Denial-of-service attack; Input-to-state stability; Resilient observer-based control

资金

  1. Funds of National Science of China [61621004, U1908213]
  2. National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents [BX20200078]
  3. Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Synthetical Automation for Process Industries [2018ZCX03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a solution to the problem of resilient observer-based control for cyber-physical systems under Denial-of-Service attacks, by introducing interval partition technique and linear matrix inequalities to reduce the conservatism in stability analysis, and providing a design strategy to improve the resilience against DoS. Numerical example demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed method in tolerating more intensive DoS attacks.
This paper deals with the problem of resilient observer-based control for cyber-physical systems with multiple transmissions under Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks. Instead of adopting the existing static output feedback controller, an observer-based controller is adopted. First, based on the property that the dwell-time of DoS is bounded, an interval partition technique is introduced to reduce the conservatism of stability analysis. Second, sufficient conditions for the desired observer-based controller is provided in terms of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs). Based on the obtained conditions, a resilient observer based controller design strategy is provided to improve the resilience against DoS. Finally, a numerical example is given to show the effectiveness of the proposed interval partition technique and observer-based controller. It is shown that that more intensive DoS attacks can be tolerated. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据