4.7 Article

A differential evolution based feature combination selection algorithm for high-dimensional data

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 547, 期 -, 页码 870-886

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.08.081

关键词

Binary space partitioning; Differential evolution; Feature combination; High-dimensional data

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation Program of China [61772124]
  2. North China University of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper introduces a fast evolutionary optimization method called search history-guided differential evolution for selecting feature combinations from high-dimensional data. Comparative studies show that the proposed algorithm has superior performance in selecting feature combinations, providing a reference for studying the functional mechanisms of related diseases.
Feature combination selection is used in object classification to select complementary features that can produce a powerful combination. One active area of selecting feature combinations is genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, selecting feature combinations from high-dimensional GWAS data faces a serious issue of high computational complexity. In this paper, a fast evolutionary optimization method named search history-guided differential evolution (HGDE) is proposed to deal with the problem. This method applies the search history memorized in a binary space partitioning tree to enhance its power for selecting feature combinations. We perform a comparative study on the proposed HGDE algorithm and other state-of-the-art algorithms using synthetic datasets, and later employ the HGDE algorithm in experiments on a real age-related macular degeneration dataset. The experimental results show that this proposed algorithm has superior performance in the selection of feature combinations. Moreover, the results provide a reference for studying the functional mechanisms of age-related macular degeneration. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据