期刊
INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 549, 期 -, 页码 68-86出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.11.021
关键词
Fuzzy rough set; Self-information; Fuzzy rough approximation; Attribute reduction
资金
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [61976027, 61976120, 61673396, 61773349]
- Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20191445]
- Six Talent Peaks Project of Jiangsu Province [XYDXXJS-048]
- Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province
- Joint project of Key Laboratory of Liaoning Province [2019-KF-03-12]
Fuzzy rough sets combined with the concept of self-information are used to construct four uncertainty measures to evaluate the classification ability of attribute subsets. The fourth measure, relative decision self-information, is proven to be better for attribute reduction. A greedy algorithm is designed for attribute reduction, and the effectiveness of the method is validated through experimental results.
The fuzzy rough set is one of the most effective methods for dealing with the fuzziness and uncertainty of data. However, in most cases this model only considers the information provided by the lower approximation of a decision when it is used to attribute reduction. In a realistic environment, the uncertainty of information is related to lower approximation as well as upper approximation. In this study, we construct four kinds of uncertainty measures by combining fuzzy rough approximations with the concept of self-information. These uncertainty measures can be employed to evaluate the classification ability of attribute subsets. The relationships between these measures are discussed in detail. It is proven that the fourth measure, called relative decision self-information, is better for attribute reduction than the other measures because it considers both the lower and upper approximations of a fuzzy decision. The proposed measures are generalizations of classical measures based on fuzzy rough sets. Finally, we have designed a greedy algorithm for attribute reduction. We validate the effectiveness of the proposed method by comparing the experimental results for efficiency and accuracy with those of three other algorithms using fundamental data. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据