4.6 Article

Organic Sorbents for Air Purification: A New Application for Recyclable Hyper-Cross-Linked Polystyrene

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 60, 期 10, 页码 3969-3980

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c05722

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) [223464]
  2. Mitacs Elevate postdoctoral fellowship [IT12461]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study looked into the effectiveness of hyper-cross-linked polystyrenic sorbents, with the nanostructured MN270 showing a reduction of formaldehyde concentration by over 95% in short-term tests, comparable to the performance of activated carbon. The nanostructure and high specific surface area of MN270 played a key role in its superior sorptive properties.
Sorption-based air purification is typically performed using inorganic sorbents such as activated carbon. Organic polymeric sorbents with a microporous or nanoporous structure could be a promising alternative. We investigated the effectiveness of four hyper-cross-linked polystyrenic sorbents against formaldehyde and compared it to the effectiveness of three activated-carbon-based preparations. One of the polystyrenic sorbents (MN270) was nanostructured, and it reduced formaldehyde concentration by over 95% (from 0.463 +/- 0.037 mg/m(3) to 0.020 +/- 0.002 mg/m(3)) in short-duration tests. In the long-duration tests (500 min), MN270's performance was comparable to that of the pure coconut shell activated carbon. MN270 was found to be nanostructured (10-200 nm pores), which was associated with its superior sorptive properties and the comparatively high Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) result of 1370.49 +/- 19.19 m(2)/g, which was higher than the best-performing activated carbon sorbent (941.76 +/- 18.10 m(2)/g). The novel application of the hyper-cross-linked polystyrenic sorbents for air purification provides a feasible and potentially more sustainable alternative to inorganic sorbents, thanks to their recyclability and manufacturability from biomass.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据