4.6 Article

Robust, Self-Healable Siloxane Elastomers Constructed by Multiple Dynamic Bonds for Stretchable Electronics and Microsystems

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 60, 期 5, 页码 2154-2162

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c05238

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51673054]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By utilizing multiple dynamic bonds, a siloxane polymer elastomer with rapid self-healing and high stretchability was designed. Experimental results demonstrate the elastomer's good mechanical properties at room temperature and high self-healable efficiency, showing potential for applications in flexible electronic devices.
Self-healable siloxane elastomers have recently attracted much interest in research for applications in flexible electronic devices. However, it remains a challenge for self-healable siloxane elastomers to realize good mechanical and rapid high-efficiency self-healable properties at room temperature. Herein, a desirable siloxane polymer elastomer was designed by the synergy of multiple dynamic bonds. In this self-healable system, the disulfide bonds as sacrificial bonds and hydrogen bonds as weak bonds could endow elastomers with rapid self-healability and high stretchability. Whereas, the Fe-coordination bonds could tune the robustness of a siloxane elastomer. Due to the synergy of multiple dynamic bonds, the self-healable PDMS-SS-DOPA1-Fe2 elastomer achieved high stretchability of 1100%, tensile stress of 1.11 MPa, and high self-healable efficiency of 96% (within 3 h). Moreover, after healing for 3 min at room temperature, the damaged siloxane elastomers were able to obtain a breaking strain of 250% and tensile stress of 0.5 MPa. As a proof of concept, based on elastomer films integrated with liquid metal alloy EGaIn (eutectic gallium-indium), stretchable electrodes and strain sensors were subsequently developed, opening the avenue to potential applications in flexible electronics and microsystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据