4.7 Article

Fast Randomized-MUSIC for Mm-Wave Massive MIMO Radars

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
卷 70, 期 2, 页码 1952-1956

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2021.3051266

关键词

Estimation; Radar; Covariance matrices; Complexity theory; Sensors; Multiple signal classification; Massive MIMO; Automotive radars; low-rank approximation; massive MIMO; mm-wave; randomized MUSIC

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [U1805262]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a fast randomized-MUSIC (R-MUSIC) algorithm that utilizes random matrix sketching to estimate signal subspace, reducing computational complexity while maintaining high accuracy. This method resolves the contradiction between complexity and accuracy in MIMO radar signal processing, showing potential for real-time super-resolution automotive sensing.
Subspace methods are essential to high-resolution environment sensing in the emerging unmanned systems, if further combined with the millimeter-wave (mm-Wave) massive multi-input multi-output (MIMO) technique. The estimation of signal/noise subspace, as one critical step, is yet computationally complex and presents a particular challenge when developing high-resolution yet low-complexity automotive radars. In this work, we develop a fast randomized-MUSIC (R-MUSIC) algorithm, which exploits the random matrix sketching to estimate the signal subspace via approximated computation. Our new approach substantially reduces the time complexity in acquiring a high-quality signal subspace. Moreover, the accuracy of R-MUSIC suffers no degradation unlike others low-complexity counterparts, i.e. the high-resolution angle of arrival (AoA) estimation is attained. Numerical simulations are provided to validate the performance of our R-MUSIC method. As shown, it resolves the long-standing contradiction in complexity and accuracy of MIMO radar signal processing, which hence have great potentials in real-time super-resolution automotive sensing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据