4.8 Review

Review of the State of the Art on Adaptive Protection for Microgrids Based on Communications

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 1539-1552

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2020.3006845

关键词

Circuit breakers; Microgrids; Reliability; Wireless communication; Adaptive systems; Circuit faults; Fault currents; Adaptive protection; communication systems; distributed energy resources (DER); microgrids; renewable energy sources (RES); ultrareliable and low-latency communications (URLLC); 5G

资金

  1. Academy of Finland through the ee-IoT Project [319009]
  2. FIREMAN consortium [CHIST-ERA/326270]
  3. DIGI-USER research platform
  4. EnergyNet Fellowship [321265, 328869]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dominance of distributed energy resources in microgrids and their weather dependence require flexible protection, with communication technologies playing a key role in coordinating adaptive devices. This coordination imposes strict requirements, with communications needing to be available and ultra-reliable with bounded latency in the order of milliseconds.
The dominance of distributed energy resources in microgrids and the associated weather dependence require flexible protection. They include devices capable of adapting their protective settings as a reaction to (potential) changes in the state of the system. Communication technologies have a key role in this system, since the reactions of the adaptive devices shall be coordinated. This coordination imposes strict requirements: communications must be available and ultrareliable with bounded latency in the order of milliseconds. This article reviews the state of the art in the field and provides a thorough analysis of the main related communication technologies and optimization techniques. We also present our perspective on the future of communication deployments in microgrids, indicating the viability of 5G wireless systems and multiconnectivity to enable adaptive protection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据