4.8 Article

Effective Magnetic Component Design of Three-Phase Dual-Active-Bridge Converter for LVDC Distribution System

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
卷 68, 期 3, 页码 1828-1840

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2020.2972462

关键词

Isolated bidirectional dc-dc converter; low-voltage direct current distribution system; three-phase dual-active-bridge converter (3P-DAB)

资金

  1. Korea Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning and Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy [2019381010001A]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [2019381010001A] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A practical design methodology is proposed to enhance the power conversion efficiency of a three-phase dual-active-bridge (3P-DAB) converter by reducing phase current and transistor turn-off current, which has been verified by experimental results using a 25-kW prototype 3P-DAB converter.
To improve the power conversion efficiency of a three-phase dual-active-bridge (3P-DAB) converter for low-voltage direct current distribution systems, a practical design methodology is proposed. Commonly, the 3P-DAB converter is designed by only specification, such as the rated power, input/output voltage, and frequency. However, using the conventional design method, the efficiency is low under heavy load conditions due to the high conduction loss. In this article, based on the practical power loss analysis, the effective design methodology of the coupling inductance in the 3P-DAB converter is proposed, focusing on power conversion efficiency. It can mitigate the drawbacks of the common design by reducing the peak and rms phase current and the insulated-gate bipolar transistors turn-off current. Experimental results verify the validity of the proposed design methodology and controller using a 25-kW prototype 3P-DAB converter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据