4.8 Article

A Modified Model Predictive Current Control of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
卷 68, 期 2, 页码 1025-1034

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2020.2970671

关键词

Current control; permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) drive; predictive control

资金

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board-Department of Science Technology [ECR/2018/001541]
  2. National Institute of Technology, Warangal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposes an improved MPCC method to enhance the steady-state performance of PMSM by optimizing the selection of voltage vectors to reduce current ripples. The method is based on calculating q-axis current slopes to determine optimal timing.
Model predictive current control (MPCC) is widely used and more popular control method for a permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) drive. It is less complex and simple to understand as compared with other predictive control methods. MPCC involves the evaluation of a simpler cost function for selecting an optimal voltage vector (VV), which is based on the minimization of error between reference and sensed currents. For a two-level inverter with limited number of VV, MPCC gives poor steady-state performance as a single VV is applied over one sampling interval. In this article, for improving the steady-state performance of PMSM, an improved MPCC is proposed. In this proposed MPCC method, an active VV along with a zero VV is applied similar to the duty cycle control (DCC); however, the timings of active VV and zero VV are selected to decrease the q-axis current ripples. The method introduced in this article is based on the calculation of q-axis current slopes to calculate optimal timing for different VVs. The method introduced in this article is compared with conventional MPCC (C-MPCC) and MPCC with DCC. Simulation and experimentation is carried out for comparison and to confirm the effectiveness of introduced MPCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据