4.8 Article

R-Sets, Comprehensive Fuzzy Sets Risk Modeling for Risk-Based Information Fusion and Decision-Making

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 385-399

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2955061

关键词

Decision-making; future events risk; risk of information; R-numbers; RS-technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS)

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the Spanish National Research [PGC2018-099402-B-I00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article addresses the issue of risk in fuzzy sets and numbers, introducing a new concept called R-sets to examine different risk cases arising from future events and unreliable information sources, and presenting mathematical relations for analysis. The R-sets method is applied to develop a decision-making approach and tested using a case study to overcome previous limitations of R-numbers.
Fuzzy sets were initially proposed to address ambiguities and uncertainties. However, in certain cases, the fuzzy sets show some degree of uncertainty and risk, when the available data are either obtained from unreliable sources or related to future events. To solve this problem, the R-numbers methodology has been recently developed as a powerful approach to model the risk of fuzzy sets and numbers due to risk factors. In R-numbers, only the variability of x values has been taken into account in risk modeling of the fuzzy sets, but not their membership function. Moreover, merely one source of risk factors related to fuzzy sets and numbers has been considered. Therefore, this article presents a new concept called R-sets, in which different risk cases of a membership function due to both future events and unreliable information sources are investigated, and the governing mathematical relations are presented. Subsequently, to overcome previous limitations of R-numbers, the R-sets are applied to develop a decision-making method, and it is tested by using a case study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据