4.7 Article

A Survey on the Hypervolume Indicator in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TEVC.2020.3013290

关键词

Evolutionary algorithms; hypervolume contribution; hypervolume indicator; many-objective optimization; multiobjective optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61876075]
  2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory [2020B121201001]
  3. Program for Guangdong Introducing Innovative and Enterpreneurial Teams [2017ZT07X386]
  4. Shenzhen Science and Technology Program [KQTD2016112514355531]
  5. Program for University Key Laboratory of Guangdong Province [2017KSYS008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article provides a comprehensive survey on the hypervolume indicator widely used in the field of evolutionary multiobjective optimization. The goal is to help researchers deepen their understanding of the principles and applications of the hypervolume indicator, and to promote further utilization of it.
Hypervolume is widely used as a performance indicator in the field of evolutionary multiobjective optimization (EMO). It is used not only for performance evaluation of EMO algorithms (EMOAs) but also in indicator-based EMOAs to guide the search. Since its initial proposal in the late 1990s, a wide variety of studies have been done on various topics, including hypervolume calculation, optimal $\mu $ -distribution, subset selection, hypervolume-based EMOAs, and extensions of the hypervolume indicator. However, currently there is no work to systematically survey the hypervolume indicator for these topics whereas it has been frequently used in the EMO field. This article aims to fill this gap and provide a comprehensive survey on the hypervolume indicator. We expect that this survey will help EMO researchers to understand the hypervolume indicator more deeply and thoroughly, and promote further utilization of the hypervolume indicator in the EMO field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据