4.7 Article

An Efficient Recursive Differential Grouping for Large-Scale Continuous Problems

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TEVC.2020.3009390

关键词

Cooperative co-evolution (CC); decomposition; large-scale global optimization

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2019CFB584]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61305086, 61673355]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan [CUGL170412]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cooperative co-evolution (CC) is an efficient evolutionary framework for large-scale optimization problems, but its performance is affected by variable decomposition. To reduce computational costs, an efficient recursive differential grouping (ERDG) method is proposed in this article, which utilizes historical information to examine variable interrelationships and improve performance.
Cooperative co-evolution (CC) is an efficient and practical evolutionary framework for solving large-scale optimization problems. The performance of CC is affected by the variable decomposition. An accurate variable decomposition can help to improve the performance of CC on solving an optimization problem. The variable grouping methods usually spend many computational resources obtaining an accurate variable decomposition. To reduce the computational cost on the decomposition, we propose an efficient recursive differential grouping (ERDG) method in this article. By exploiting the historical information on examining the interrelationship between the variables of an optimization problem, ERDG is able to avoid examining some interrelationship and spend much less computation than other recursive differential grouping methods. Our experimental results and analysis suggest that ERDG is a competitive method for decomposing large-scale continuous problems and improves the performance of CC for solving the large-scale optimization problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据