4.6 Article

Impact of the Ohmic Electrode on the Endurance of Oxide-Based Resistive Switching Memory

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES
卷 68, 期 3, 页码 1024-1030

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TED.2021.3049765

关键词

Switches; Electrodes; Reliability; Zirconium; Hafnium; Electric potential; Chemicals; Defect formation energy (DFE); endurance algorithm; endurance; OxRAM; redox-based resistive switching memory (ReRAM); valence change mechanism (VCM)

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 917]
  2. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, Germany) through the project NEUROTEC [16ES1134, 16ES1133K]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research focuses on maximizing the endurance of ReRAMs by using specific combinations of switching oxide and ohmic electrode metals. A sophisticated programming algorithm is proposed to achieve this goal, and comparisons of ReRAM devices with different OE metals confirm the theoretically predicted trend, providing valuable information for device engineering towards higher endurance.
As one of the key aspects in the reliability of redox-based resistive switching memories (ReRAMs), maximizing their endurance is of high relevance for industrial applications. The major limitation regarding endurance is considered the excessive generation of oxygen vacancies during cycling, which eventually leads to irreversible RESET failures. Thus, the endurance could be increased by using combinations of switching oxide and ohmic electrode (OE) metal that provides a high barrier for the generation of oxygen vacancies [defect formation energy (DFE)]. In this work, we present a sophisticated programming algorithm that aims to maximize the endurance within reasonable measurement time. Using this algorithm, we compare ReRAM devices with four different OE metals and confirm the theoretically predicted trend. Thus, our work provides valuable information for device engineering toward higher endurance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据