4.7 Article

Stochastic Approximation for Risk-Aware Markov Decision Processes

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL
卷 66, 期 3, 页码 1314-1320

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2020.2989702

关键词

Markov decision processes (MDPs); risk measure; saddle point; stochastic approximation; Q-learning

资金

  1. SRIBD International Postdoctoral Fellowship
  2. National Research Foundation, Prime Ministers Office, Singapore under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise program
  3. Singapore Ministry of Education Grant [R-266-000-083-133]
  4. Singapore Ministry of Education Tier II Grant [MOE2015-T2-2-148]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A stochastic approximation algorithm was developed to solve risk-aware Markov decision processes, covering various risk measures and establishing almost sure convergence and convergence rate of the algorithm. The overall convergence rate of the algorithm was proven to be Omega((ln(1/delta epsilon)/epsilon(2))(1/k) + (ln(1/epsilon))(1/(1-k))) with probability at least 1-delta for a given error tolerance epsilon > 0 and learning rate k in the range (1/2, 1].
We develop a stochastic approximation-type algorithm to solve finite state/action, infinite-horizon, risk-aware Markov decision processes. Our algorithm has two loops. The inner loop computes the risk by solving a stochastic saddle-point problem. The outer loop performs Q-learning to compute an optimal risk-aware policy. Several widely investigated risk measures (e.g., conditional value-at-risk, optimized certainty equivalent, and absolute semideviation) are covered by our algorithm. Almost sure convergence and the convergence rate of the algorithm are established. For an error tolerance epsilon > 0 for optimal Q-value estimation gap and learning rate k is an element of (1/2, 1], the overall convergence rate of our algorithm is Omega((ln(1/delta epsilon)/epsilon(2))(1/k) + (ln(1/epsilon))(1/(1-k))) with probability at least 1-delta.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据