4.7 Article

A Sequential Target Existence Statistic for Joint Probabilistic Data Association

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2020.3018899

关键词

Target tracking; Clutter; Current measurement; Time measurement; Logic gates; Indexes; Probabilistic logic; Assignment problems; integrated probabilistic data association (PDA); joint integrated probabilistic data association (JIPDA); measurement association; multitarget tracking; parameter tuning; score function; sequential probability ratio test (SPRT); target existence; track confirmation; track management (TM); track termination; track validation

资金

  1. Naval Undersea Warfare Center Section 219 Internal Investment Portfolio

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A sequential probability ratio test (SPRT) has been introduced as a track management mechanism for the joint probabilistic data association (JPDA) multitarget tracking algorithm. Simulation experiments show that the SPRT-based algorithm achieves performance similar to JIPDA, with fewer parameters and a more straightforward parameter-tuning process, for multiple closely spaced constant-velocity targets over a range of detection probability and clutter density values.
A sequential probability ratio test (SPRT) is introduced as a track management (TM) mechanism for the joint probabilistic data association (JPDA) multitarget tracking algorithm. The SPRT is based on an approximate target likelihood ratio that is derived from the JPDA event and association probabilities. SPRT-based TM functions are defined and compared to the joint integrated probabilistic data association (JIPDA) algorithm, including a discussion of parameter tuning for both approaches. Simulation experiments are reported for multiple closely spaced constant-velocity targets over a range of values for detection probability and clutter density. The SPRT-based algorithm achieves performance similar to JIPDA for this data, but with fewer TM parameters and a more straightforward parameter-tuning process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据