4.7 Article

Faster Multiscale Capsule Network With Octave Convolution for Hyperspectral Image Classification

期刊

IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 361-365

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2020.2970079

关键词

Convolution; Redundancy; Feature extraction; Hyperspectral imaging; Kernel; Encoding; Capsule networks; convolutional neural network (CNN); hyperspectral image (HSI) classification; octave convolution

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61502003, 61671018, 61860206004, 61976003]
  2. Key Research Project of Humanities and Social Sciences in Colleges and Universities of Anhui Province [SK2019A0013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposes a faster multiscale capsule network with octave convolution for hyperspectral image classification, which reduces parameter redundancy and improves accuracy. The novel approach demonstrates competitive advantages in both classification accuracy and computational time compared to existing methods.
Recently proposed capsule networks have revealed powerfulness in various visual tasks. However, the traditional CNNs adopted in the capsule layer of the capsule network have the problem of high parameter redundancy. In this letter, we propose a faster multiscale capsule network with octave convolution (MSOctCaps) for hyperspectral image classification. In the proposed MSOctCaps, we design multiple kernels of different sizes with parallel convolution to extract deep multiscale features. To feasibly reduce the redundancy of parameters and achieve high accuracy, the octave convolution is explored in the capsule layer, instead of the traditional convolution, which improves the accuracy of the capsule layer above predicted by the capsule layer below. The comparison experiments with six state-of-the-arts on two challenging contest data sets demonstrate the proposed MSOctCaps is able to produce competitive advantages in terms of both classification accuracy and computational time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据