4.6 Article

Light wavelength and intensity effects on larval settlement in the Pacific oyster Magallana gigas

期刊

HYDROBIOLOGIA
卷 848, 期 7, 页码 1611-1621

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-021-04550-9

关键词

Pediveliger; Eyespot; Light absorbance; Light-emitting diodes; Settlement

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [19K15897]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K15897] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through experiments, it was found that different light conditions have different effects on the settlement of Pacific oyster larvae. Red and near infrared light have a settlement-inducing effect, while near ultraviolet, blue, white, and green light can disrupt larval settlement.
Oyster larvae initially have an eyespot on settlement stage (pediveligers). This study investigated the eyespot with light wavelength-dependent absorbance, and its functional details for settlement in the Pacific oyster Magallana gigas larvae. Eyespot efficiently absorbed 500-650 nm of light wavelength. Based on the eyespot absorbance, pediveligers were subjected to different light conditions with light-emitting diodes (LEDs): near ultraviolet (NUV), blue, white, green, red, and near infrared (NIR), set at 3 intensities (5, 15, 25 W/m(2), except for NIR, which was at 25, 50, 100 lux). LEDs modulated at each intensity were continuously irradiated for 2 days, and the number of settled larvae on a substrate of shell chips was counted daily. NUV at 15, 25 W/m(2), and white and green light at 5, 15 W/m(2) disrupted larval settlement, whereas red at 25 W/m(2) and NIR at 100 lux showed strong settlement-inducing activities. Red and NIR were further tested with ceramic paper substrates; inert substrates. These lights maintained their performance, with settlement rates higher than controls in darkness. Our findings contribute to the further understanding of the function of eyespot in the settlement of oyster larvae, and to establish criteria to evaluate light pollution levels for protecting benthic ecosystem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据