相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。Stubbing out hypothetical bias: improving tobacco market predictions by combining stated and revealed preference data
John Buckell et al.
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS (2019)
Longer-term efficiency and safety of increasing the frequency of whole blood donation (INTERVAL): extension study of a randomised trial of 20 757 blood donors
Stephen Kaptoge et al.
LANCET HAEMATOLOGY (2019)
Yes, health is important, but as much for its importance via social life: The direct and indirect effects of health on subjective well-being in chronically ill individuals
Admassu N. Lamu et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2018)
How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity
Matthew Quaife et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS (2018)
External Validity of Contingent Valuation: Comparing Hypothetical and Actual Payments
Mandy Ryan et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2017)
Efficiency and safety of varying the frequency of whole blood donation (INTERVAL): a randomised trial of 45 000 donors
Emanuele Di Angelantonio et al.
LANCET (2017)
Discrete Choice Experiments: A Guide to Model Specification, Estimation and Software
Emily Lancsar et al.
PHARMACOECONOMICS (2017)
Beyond the person: the construction and transformation of blood as a resource
Rebecca Lynch et al.
CRITICAL PUBLIC HEALTH (2017)
Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force
A. Brett Hauber et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2016)
MITIGATING HYPOTHETICAL BIAS IN STATED PREFERENCE DATA: EVIDENCE FROM SPORTS TOURISM
John C. Whitehead et al.
ECONOMIC INQUIRY (2016)
Preferences for Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: a Best-Best Discrete Choice Experiment
Peter Ghijben et al.
PHARMACOECONOMICS (2014)
Reconceptualising the External Validity of Discrete Choice Experiments
Emily Lancsar et al.
PHARMACOECONOMICS (2014)
Development of common metrics for donation attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and intention for the blood donation context
Janis L. France et al.
TRANSFUSION (2014)
Hypothetical bias in Stated Choice Experiments: Is it a problem? And if so, how do we deal with it?
Simon Fifer et al.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE (2014)
Evaluating mitigation and calibration techniques for hypothetical bias in choice experiments
Craig D. Broadbent
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT (2014)
Constructing Experimental Designs for Discrete-Choice Experiments: Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force
F. Reed Johnson et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2013)
To pay or not to pay - the role of monetary incentives in an optimal blood donation service bundle
Marius Mews
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR MARKETING (2013)
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature
Esther W. de Bekker-Grob et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2012)
Surrogates, meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness modelling: a combined analytic approach
Neil Hawkins et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2012)
Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations
Joanna Coast et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2012)
Self-image and valuation of moral goods: Stated versus actual willingness to pay
Olof Johansson-Stenman et al.
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION (2012)
Exploring the dynamics of the theory of planned behavior in the context of blood donation: does donation experience make a difference?
Ingrid Veldhuizen et al.
TRANSFUSION (2011)
WHAT'S TO KNOW ABOUT HYPOTHETICAL BIAS IN STATED PREFERENCE VALUATION STUDIES?
John Loomis
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS (2011)
Design of Stated Preference Surveys: Is There More to Learn from Behavioral Economics?
Fredrik Carlsson
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2010)
Free cholesterol testing as a motivation device in blood donations: evidence from field experiments
Lorenz Goette et al.
TRANSFUSION (2009)
Predicting blood donation intentions and behavior among Australian blood donors: testing an extended theory of planned behavior model
Barbara M. Masser et al.
TRANSFUSION (2009)
Valuing beach access and width with revealed and stated preference data
John C. Whitehead et al.
MARINE RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2008)
Predicting intentions to donate blood among nondonors in Australia: an extended theory of planned behavior
Natalie G. Robinson et al.
TRANSFUSION (2008)
Willingness to pay for a green energy program: A comparison of ex-ante and ex-post hypothetical bias mitigation approaches
John C. Whitehead et al.
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS (2007)
A path analysis of intention to redonate among experienced blood donors: an extension of the theory of planned behavior
Janis L. France et al.
TRANSFUSION (2007)
What you don't know might hurt you: Some unresolved issues in the design and analysis of discrete choice experiments
JJ Louviere
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2006)
Convenience, the bane of our existence, and other barriers to donating
GB Schreiber et al.
TRANSFUSION (2006)
Environmental risk and averting behavior: Predictive validity of jointly estimated revealed and stated behavior data
J Whitehead
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2005)
Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates
S Caussade et al.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL (2005)
A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation
JJ Murphy et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2005)
Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: The case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation
I Ajzen et al.
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN (2004)
Using stated preference and revealed preference modeling to evaluate prescribing decisions
TL Mark et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2004)
Titmuss and the gift relationship: altruism revisited
FL Rapport et al.
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING (2002)
What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values?
JA List et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2001)
Optimal designs for 2(k) paired comparison experiments
DJ Street et al.
COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS (2001)