4.7 Article

An Atmospheric Signal Lowering the Spring Predictability Barrier in Statistical ENSO Forecasts

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 48, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020GL091287

关键词

Data‐ driven models; ENSO; SST footprint; statistical forecasts

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-42-04121]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [19-02-00502]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [19-42-04121] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies suggest that Pacific atmospheric circulation anomalies in winter-spring may impact summer tropical climate via SST footprinting. Researchers have inferred an index based on sea level pressure data surrounding Hawaii and constructed a statistically optimal linear model of the Nino 3.4 index with this atmospheric index as a forcing, leading to significant improvements in interseasonal Nino 3.4 forecasts by efficiently lowering the spring predictability barrier.
The loss of autocorrelations of tropical sea surface temperatures (SST) during late spring, also called the spring predictability barrier (SPB), is a factor that strongly limits the predictability of El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO), and especially the statistical SST-based ENSO forecasts starting from the winter-spring season. Recent studies show that Pacific atmospheric circulation anomalies in winter-spring may have a long-term impact on the summer tropical climate via the SST footprint. Here, we infer an index based on sea level pressure (SLP) data from February to March in a single area surrounding Hawaii, and show that this area is the most informative part of the large SLP pattern initiating the SST footprinting mechanism. We then construct a statistically optimal linear model of the Nino 3.4 index taking this atmospheric index as a forcing. We find that this forcing efficiently lowers the SPB and provides significant improvements of interseasonal Nino 3.4 forecasts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据