4.7 Article

Widespread Tissintite in Strongly Shock-Lithified Lunar Regolith Breccias

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 48, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020GL091554

关键词

corundum; lunar breccia; lunar regolith; shock‐ lithification; tissintite

资金

  1. B-type Strategic Priority Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB41000000]
  2. preresearch Project on Civil Aerospace Technologies - CNSA [D020204]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42025302, 41973061, 41673068]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of tissintite, Si-rich corundum, and coesite in strongly shock-lithified lunar meteorites suggests a shock pressure of 4-8 GPa and a temperature constraint of around 2300K, providing significant insights into the behavior of volatile elements and remanent magnetization records during shock-lithification.
Shock-lithification is a fundamental process of making rocks from fine-grained and porous regoliths on the surface of the Moon. Previous investigations have constrained potential shock pressures during shock-lithification based on experimental and numerical simulations. However, pressure and temperature conditions during shock-lithification have not been directly inferred from natural lunar breccias. Here, we report the discovery of widespread tissintite in strongly shock-lithified lunar meteorites, accompanied occasionally by Si-rich corundum and coesite. The coexistence of tissintite and coesite and the absence of stishovite in molten regions indicate a shock pressure of 4-8 GPa, which might be the pressure boundary between weak and strong shock-lithification. Meanwhile, the presence of Si-rich corundum imposes a temperature constraint of similar to 2,300 K for the intergranular melts. This temperature constraint has profound significance for interpreting the behaviors of volatile and moderately volatile elements and remanent magnetization records during strongly shock-lithification of lunar breccias.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据