Geomorphic insights from eroding dredge spoil mounds impacting channel morphology

A number of large rivers across the world are dredged for navigation. Dredging removes sediment from the channel, creates spoil mounds in the adjoining floodplain, and disposes sediment along the channel margin on a bar, or in open water. Retrospective studies that examine the placement and fate of this disposed material can provide guidance for other localities where dredging is practiced, and better elucidate the impacts associated with disposal at different types of sites. Many studies exist for impacts and benefits of dredging in the coastal environment, particularly to ecosystems and water quality. Few studies have examined disposal site selection and the fate of dredge spoil placed along a river corridor from a geomorphic and retrospective perspective. The Apalachicola River in Florida was dredged from the 1950s for several decades, with disposal on sand bars, in open water on the channel margins, and on the floodplain. Numerous large and small floodplain dredge-spoil mounds are a legacy from this navigation project. One of the larger mounds, disposal site 40 (DS 40), which locals call Sand Mountain, stands similar to 22 m high and extends similar to 10 ha in area. This disposal site originated in an artificial cutoff created in 1968-69 and grew to hold >625,000 m(3) of sediment. Because this section of river was a problem for navigation when dredging was being conducted, detailed historical survey sheets with topographic and bathymetric data exist. The purpose of this paper was to analyze the local floodplain and channel geospatially, coupled with dredging and disposal data, to interpret the geomorphic changes of DS 40 and the adjoining river. Poor placement has resulted in this and other dredge spoil mounds returning sediment to the river through lateral erosion and mass wasting. Intermittent sediment pulses have altered channel morphology adjacent to the spoil mound with the channel becoming wider and shallower than originally, mean bed and thalweg elevations increasing by similar to 1.5 to 2 m, and width-depth ratio increasing three-fold. Although dredging of this river has not been conducted for nearly two decades, study of historical dredge spoil mounds in this reach suggest poor placement of spoil can continue to stress and alter a river in the decades that follow. Based on our findings, dredging downstream of distributaries will have poor outcomes. Dredge spoil placement in cut-off channels close to the river can be problematic because the river will regain sinuosity. Further, sites on the outer bend of meanders are more subject to erosion, and sites immediately upstream of problem or shallow areas will feed sediment to the problem reach. Findings of this study have implications to other settings, such as intensively mined rivers where unused unconsolidated material is often left on floodplains. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Automated summary

Dredging of large rivers for navigation purposes often involves disposing of sediment in adjacent floodplains and water bodies. This study examined the impact of dredge spoil placement on the Apalachicola River, and found that poor placement led to lateral erosion and morphological changes in the river channel. The findings suggest that improper disposal of dredge spoil can continue to impact rivers for decades to come.