4.7 Article

Expert-based maps and highly detailed surface drainage models to support digital soil mapping

期刊

GEODERMA
卷 384, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114779

关键词

Digital soil mapping; Drainage network; Random forest; Detailed soil map

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  2. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2014/22262-0, 2018/23760-4, 2017/03207-6, 2016/26124-6, 2020/043060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies on soil maps using digital mapping techniques, considering drainage network info, evaluate its contribution to predicting soil classes. By calibrating models and cross-validation to optimize model selection, the performance of the models was validated.
Soil maps are an important tool for agricultural planning and land management. Digital techniques have been used to create soil maps. However, most studies did not explore drainage network (DN) information on prediction models, which are related to soil variability. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the contribution of DN to predict soil classes using digital soil mapping techniques. We used a conventional soil class map (1:20,000) and environmental variables, such as drainage and relief attributes and satellite images, aiming to extrapolate the soil map to a larger area. The work was conducted in Sao Paulo State, Brazil. We created a point grid with 30 x 30 m resolution to extract the soil and variables information. We used these data to calibrate a random forest model along with cross-validation to optimize the model selection. The predicted soil classes for the 53,800-ha study area were determined on two levels according to the World Reference Base (WRB) soil classification system. The first level considered only soil groups (i.e. Acrisol and Ferralsol), while the second level considered the soil group and a qualifier (i.e. Chromic Acrisol and Rhodic Acrisol). We validated the maps using other conventional soils maps (internal validation) and field sampling points (external validation). After extrapolating the soil map, we validated the models performance using field observations. In this case, the method reached an accuracy of 0.56 and kappa of 0.31 for the soil's first level, and 0.38 and 0.25 for the second level. Regosols and Cambisols prediction was underestimated, lowering the accuracy and kappa results on the validation. However, Ferralsols reached accuracy and Acrisols reached around 70% accuracy. The drainage related attributes had the highest contribution to the model's performance (accuracy = 56%) and improved the soil map extrapolation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据