4.6 Article

Biochemical conversion of Brassica carinata biomass to organic acids

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 618-626

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12812

关键词

Brassica carinata; carinata meal; cellulosic biomass; fermentation; hydrolysate; propionibacteria; propionic acid

资金

  1. National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2016-11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that converting Brassica carinata cellulose into propionic acid has promising economic potential and sustainability. By enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of pretreated carinata meal (CM), propionic acid can be efficiently produced as a renewable raw material for industrial chemicals and food preservatives.
The economics of the inedible oilseed crop Brassica carinata as a source of renewable fuels can be enhanced by converting its cellulosic biomass to value-added chemicals, such as organic acids. We investigated the biochemical conversion of carinata biomass to propionic acid by first pretreating the carinata meal (CM), which is obtained after extraction of the oil from carinata seeds, with concentrated phosphoric acid to remove hemicellulose and gain access to the cellulose constituent of the meal. We then subjected the pretreated meal to enzymatic hydrolysis with cellulase enzyme to depolymerize cellulose to glucose. The overall conversion of carinata cellulose to glucose was 85%, which is promising. Finally, the recovered glucose was successfully fermented primarily to propionic acid using the bacterium Propionibacterium freudenreichii with a yield of 0.57 g of produced propionic acid per gram of consumed cellulosic glucose. The biobased propionic acid and other co-produced organic acids can serve as renewable building blocks for manufacturing industrial chemicals and food preservatives replacing fossil-derived organic acids. Hence, CM constitutes a renewable source of fermentable carbohydrates potentially improving the economics and sustainability of the carinata value chain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据