4.2 Article

It remains a cage: ionization tolerance of C60 fullerene in planetary nebulae

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/1536383X.2021.1876677

关键词

Highly positively charged fullerenes; planetary nebulae; fullerene' s cage structure; stability; theoretical astrochemistry; quantum theory of atoms in molecules

资金

  1. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [17326116, 17300417]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By combining two robust theoretical quantum chemistry calculation techniques, it is shown that highly ionized forms of C-60 fullerene can be achieved up to C-60 (26+) before coulomb explosion of the cage. These highly ionized forms exhibit comparable structural and bonding stability as the neutral fullerene, opening up new avenues for studying complex ion/molecule reactions and fragmentation products. This has implications in the emerging field of astrochemistry, offering additional pathways for spreading carbon throughout the universe.
We demonstrate that by combining two robust theoretical quantum chemistry calculation techniques, stepwise ionization of C-60 fullerene by UV and extreme UV photons can in principle occur up to a limit as high as C-60 (26+) before coulomb explosion of the cage. Furthermore, these highly ionized forms exhibit a comparable structural and bonding stability as for the neutral fullerene. Certain astrophysical sources like the central stars of planetary nebulae and the hottest white dwarf stars have sufficiently hard UV radiation fields that can result in a series of highly charged C-60 ( q+) species from q = 1 up to q = 16. Harsher environments, like hot X-ray bubbles in planetary nebulae, X-ray binaries and other sources, may further push the ionization right up to the q = 26 limit. These remarkable theoretical findings add new avenues to complex ion/molecule reactions, the chemistry of fragmentation products and additional pathways for spreading carbon throughout the universe. The implications for the emerging field of astrochemistry of C-60 fullerene in all its possible states could be profound.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据